Luke
15.
I.
Sensing
his acceptance, the tax collectors and sinners gather around Jesus to hear what
he has to say. The scribes and the
Pharisees criticize him for associating with tax collectors and sinners.
In
order to explain why he hangs around with tax collectors and sinners, Jesus
offers three famous parables.
First,
he asks, “Which one of you, having a hundred sheep and losing one of them, does
not leave the ninety-nine in the wilderness and go after the one that is lost
until he finds it?”
Let’s
consider that for a minute. Is
this really how we act? Assuming the shepherd is alone with the
sheep, would he really leave the 99 alone on the hillside, to go off and look
for one that wandered off? Would he
risk coming back with the one only to find that the 99 had scattered and even
been attacked by wolves, or stolen by bandits? Would he risk having to go back to the owner with one sheep,
explaining that the other 99 were lost when he went to fetch it?
Some
commentators postulate that there were other
shepherds there with whom he could leave the 99, in order to make sense of the
parable. They say it would be so
understood that no shepherd would be out there watching 100 sheep all by himself,
that Jesus doesn’t have to mention it.
And maybe that’s true. Or maybe
we should assume that the shepherd would lock the 99 up safely in a corral, and
then go in search of the lost
one.
But
on the surface, if the shepherd is alone, the answer is that he would be irresponsible to the point of insanity to leave 99 valuable sheep
unprotected to go after one that was missing. Would we? Wouldn’t we consider it more prudent to
just write off the one, rather than jeopardize the 99?
Jesus,
of course, isn’t talking about best shepherding practices. He is answering the charge of why he
associates with the dregs and losers, the nobodies, and even the anti-social
characters in society. He places
himself with the expendable, sometimes hated, always discounted, rejects. He places himself with the people whom
the general society is content to sacrifice for the greater good.
He
knows that it is standard practice in every culture to dismiss or hate these
people. Indeed, one of the ways society
maintains its unity and coherence is by having a class or people whom everyone
is united in dismissing. It takes
their attention off of the conflicts they have with each other, to focus on the
“sinners” or the sick people whom God is obviously punishing, blaming them for
the mess the society is in.
We
still do this, for crying out
loud! We still identify
individuals and groups whom we define as “sinners” in some way, and upon whom
we decide to place the blame for our predicament. Hating them brings the rest of us together. So not only do we not go after the
single lost sheep as an economic calculus, we often arbitrarily pick out a
sheep specifically to reject! As theHighPriest
Caiaphus would later remark about Jesus, it is good for one to die so that the
rest may be saved.
II.
This
is the reasoning of the scribes and Pharisees. Their job is to hold society together. This is done by maintaining a social
order and hierarchy, part of which is and making sure there is always some
class at the very bottom who can be sacrificed, hated, rejected, blamed, scapegoated,
and sometimes even lynched. There
has to be an “other” over-against which we can all be united. It’s those “sinners.” It’s those predatory, treasonous tax
collectors.
Jesus,
however, is pretty sick of this attitude.
And he’s not alone. The
whole Hebrew Bible is written from the perspective of the lost sheep, the rejects,
the losers. It starts out as the
record of a band of escaped slaves. And it hits its stride with the
prophets railing against sacrifices,
and urging the people to do justice and love kindness. Finding our social unity by ganging up
on an invented common enemy is something the prophets find repulsive. They demand that the people remember
when they were the common enemy, and they were the slaves, and they were the victims, and not behave
that way towards others themselves.
The
scribes and Pharisees are afraid that if this hierarchy is not maintained and
if there is not a class of people at the bottom against whom everyone else can
be united, then everything, the whole Jewish nation, the whole religion, falls
apart. Because if we’re not all
focused on one common enemy, we all become enemies to each other.
Jesus
and the prophets would have us find our unity not in an arbitrarily determined
and completely innocent scapegoat who becomes the focus of our paranoia,
condemnation, righteous indignation, and violence. Rather, our unity is discovered in our shared suffering. In the middle of the Ten Commandments,
Moses says: “Remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt, and the Lord
your God brought you out from there with a mighty hand and an outstretched
arm.”
We are the lost sheep; God is the shepherd. But unlike human shepherds, God always remembers
us, seeks us out, finds us, and brings us home, even if we get lost.
III.
In
the second little parable, we are the
lost coin, and God is the woman. She searches diligently, sifting through
the dirt of her floor, until she finds us, each one of us, an insignificant,
barely valuable penny. Pennies are
what people don’t even bother to pick up from the sidewalk. Pennies are what we store in large
amounts in our drawers because they’re not worth the energy to take to the bank
and have counted and redeemed. Who
invests all this time in finding a single penny, and when finding it, throwing
a party at a cost of hundreds of dollars?
God, that’s who.
Then
Jesus launches into what may be his greatest parable. After the lost sheep and the lost coin, he gives us the parable
of the lost son. How many of our families can relate to
a lost son? I wonder if America
does not now have an entire generation of lost sons.
You’ve
all heard the story and probably at least a few sermons on it. The younger son basically gives his
father the finger, in effect, wishing his father was dead by demanding his
inheritance early. He takes the
money, which the father must have had to liquidate a fair amount of property to
provide, and goes off to waste it in what Jesus understatedly terms “dissolute
living.” Use your imagination.
He
hits bottom. The economy goes into
recession. The younger son winds
up doing a job you couldn’t pay most self-respecting
Jews to do: feeding pigs. The
remuneration is so low and he is so hungry that even the pig-feed looks
appetizing.
At
this point the younger son is almost exactly mirroring the stereotype of a “bad
kid”. He is someone who deserves
society’s just punishment. Rewarding
such behavior would only encourage him to act in a callous and irresponsible
manner again. He is wasteful,
lazy, greedy, careless, selfish, and practically a sociopath. When he winds up in the pigsty he is a
shining example for all sons of how not
to act. Parents and civic leaders
could gladly use the parable so far as a lesson to all sons who behave in this
way. See what happens when you
waste your money and reject your family?
You wind up feeding pigs!
The
upright and responsible scribes and Pharisees would nod in approval at this
point. The younger son got what he
deserved. We can all be united in
judging and rejecting him. We can
all feel superior and vindicated that for once bad behavior is punished. We can righteously leave him there with
the pigs to wallow in his misery, so we can walk by and point him out to our
young sons and say, “See? This is
what could happen to you if you upset the order of things! This is what happens to bad boys who
run off on their own! So now, when
we tell you to work hard in the vineyard, I hope you will do as we say!”
IV.
Society
needs the lost, the losers, the
failures, the victims, the sick, the outcast, so we have people to turn into
object lessons of how not to act. The
more miserable their state, the better.
But
Jesus doesn’t see object lessons.
He sees human beings. His
parable doesn’t end there where society would have him end it. He continues talking.
He
says, “But when [the younger son] came to himself he said, ‘How many of my father’s
hired hands have bread enough and to spare, but here I am dying of hunger! I will get up and go to my father, and
I will say to him, “Father, I have sinned against heaven and before you; I am
no longer worthy to be called your son; treat me like one of your hired
hands.”’ So he set off and went to
his father.”
The
conventional wisdom of the scribes and Pharisees might think they know where
this is going. The object lesson
will no doubt continue as we watch the righteous father administer the just punishment
to his evil son. No real father will be taken in by that “I
am no longer worthy” crap. No real father would let this kid get away
with what he did. If we let people
like this off, just let them come sauntering back with no consequences, society
would just fall apart into chaos.
We
can’t let these people off the hook.
We can’t reward bad behavior.
We can’t foster dependency.
The poor and the sick, the sinners, they got that way because God is
punishing them. When this kid gets
home, we hope that the father will at least give him a whipping he will never
forget. That will teach him!
But
the father in the story is not like the fathers, the leaders, of their
society. The father in the story
does not righteously demand that his
honor be appeased in blood. He
does not insist that his wrath be
satisfied. He does not crucify his son. The father in the story acts very
strangely.
Jesus
says that “while [the son] was still far off, his father saw him and was filled
with compassion; he ran and put his arms around him and kissed him.” And the father throws a great feast to
celebrate the son’s return.
And
at this point Jesus’ hearers are going, “What? This isn’t like any father I ever heard of.” And
that is Jesus’ point. God is not like any father we ever heard
of. Just like God is not like any
shepherd or housewife we ever heard of.
God does not care about the stability of the social order and
maintaining the civic hierarchy.
If God cared about that, God would have been on Pharaoh’s side, not on
the side of the Hebrew slaves.
The
father in the story doesn’t appear to know or care how his son got into this state of abject poverty. All he sees is his beloved son,
returning home, in humility and sorrow.
And his heart goes out to him.
V.
And
that is all Jesus sees in the people he meets. He sees their suffering. He sees their sorrow. He sees their
brokenness and diseases and victimization. Even in tax collectors,
for God’s sake, he sees wounded and shattered souls, driven to do harm to
others. And he embraces, and
heals, and receives, and welcomes, and forgives, and liberates them. He gathers them together in a new
community, without predatory fathers, but in equality and sharing.
When
the grumpy and resentful older brother shows up, everybody knows he represents
the scribes and Pharisees, the forces of stability and responsibility, the ones
who have to oppress and reject and hate and kill some common enemy to keep
order and unity. The ones who have
to have someone at the bottom so they can have their place near the top.
It
is as if Jesus, and through him God, is saying, “You need someone to oppress
and reject and exclude and blame and hate and kill? You need a scapegoat?
You need a lightning rod for your own wrath and sacred honor? You need someone to crucify? Take
me. Leave these people alone!
I will receive and bear all
your hate and injustice and violence, until you are exhausted; until you are
empty. Then I will receive and
forgive and love you.”
At
the end of the story, Jesus tells us that the father said to the older son,
“‘Son, you are always with me, and all that is mine is yours. But we had to celebrate and rejoice,
because this brother of yours was dead and has come to life; he was lost and
has been found.’”
If
we just could realize that we are always
with God, maybe we would not feel compelled to invent scapegoats and
hierarchies and outcasts and others to blame and feel superior to. If we could get over our mindless wrath
and honor-driven psychoses, and wake up to the truth that God is here in
infinite beauty and goodness all the time… then maybe we wouldn’t have to be
enslaving or crucifying people for the sake of social stability, order, and
peace.
But
in Jesus Christ, God is saying, “Yo, the people you hate and judge and reject
and kill? Those are the people I
love the most. So deal with
it.” Jesus doesn’t care what they
did. He is not so naïve and stupid
as to imagine that what prostitutes and tax collectors do is all blossoms and
bunnies. But when they awaken to
their pain, when they come to themselves, as the younger son does in the
pigsty, Jesus is there, waiting in the humanity he shares with us, to welcome
them home.
And
when we awaken to our pain and our bottomless sorrow, and our exhaustion from
trying to keep it all together, and when we come to ourselves, our true selves as God made us and blessed
us and gifted us, and when we can come home with nothing, with no awards or medals or achievements, with nothing but
an awareness that we have fallen short, we have missed the mark, things didn’t
turn out the way we planned, we actually worked hard against God, squandering God’s blessings and gifts and resources. When we feel no longer fit to be a
child of God… maybe that’s when we
grow into our true nature as a son or a daughter of God. Maybe then, when we don’t have an array
of self-righteous porcupine quills deployed defensively around our souls, when
we realize that we are just earthlings, just mud-people into whom God has
miraculously breathed life, that we feel that warm, welcoming, redeeming,
liberating embrace of the living God.
+++++++
No comments:
Post a Comment